Barnes & Nobleinfoseekad

Home
AllPolitics
 

 Home
 News
 Analysis
 Community
 CNN.com


Search


  Help

Clinton Vetoes Iran Sanctions Bill

U.S./Iran graphic

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, June 24) -- President Clinton vetoed legislation on Iranian sanctions Tuesday, saying it "would hinder, not help, our overall national interests."

The legislation would have automatically imposed sanctions on any foreign government or business that supplied ballistic missile technology to Iran.

The veto of the Iran Missile Proliferation Act came less than a week after Clinton expressed hope for "a genuine reconciliation with Iran" if it complied with international standards of conduct and moves away from its support of terrorism and distribution of dangerous weapons.

The administration already has eased travel to the United States for Iranians and is supporting cultural and academic exchanges.

Under the 1996 Iran and Libya Sanctions Act, the president may impose sanctions on foreign companies that invest at least $20 million annually in Iran's oil and gas sectors.

'Inflexible and indiscriminate'

The vetoed bill would have required "sweeping application of sanctions according to inflexible and indiscriminate criteria," Clinton said.

Sanctions could be wrongly triggered against individuals and businesses worldwide and would be disproportionate, penalizing minor violations the same as major ones, he said.

But Clinton said he was particularly concerned about the bill's impact on the U.S. effort to work with Russia to stem the flow of technology from Russia to Iran's missile program, a "very real problem" that the administration has given priority attention over the past year and a half, he said.

Russia recently adopted new legal and administrative measures to deal with the problem and its progress must be encouraged, not undercut, he said, and the bill would have made it more difficult for the United States to work with Russia in this area.

Imposition of unilateral U.S. sanctions, could damage work with Russia in other areas, he said, such as arms control, law enforcement, counter-narcotics and combating transnational crime.

Concern in Congress

Some members of Congress said they would push to override the veto, citing concern over moves by Russia and China to supply Iran with missile technology.

"This proliferation cannot and must not be ignored. It is a direct threat to peace in the Middle East," said Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-California "This carefully crafted legislation will strengthen the president's hand in dealing with proliferators."

House International Relations Chairman Ben Gilman, R-New York, asked GOP leaders to immediately schedule an override vote, saying the veto is "deeply distressing" in light of the assistance Iran has gotten from Russia on missile production.

"This bill does exactly what the administration said it wanted ... It sanctions companies, not countries, that sell weapons technologies," said U.S. Rep. Howard Berman of California, adding that the sanctions would help slow the technology transfers. "Buying time, to me, is a very important asset."

"This legislation gives Russian organizations that are in a position to sell missile technology to Iran compelling reasons not to do so, by forcing them to choose between short-term profits from dealing with Iran and potentially far more lucrative long-term economic relations with the United States," Gilman said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

In Other News

Wednesday, June 24, 1998

Poll: Americans Support Clinton's Trip To China
Clinton Signs Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act
Senate Passes Bill Allowing Education Saving Accounts
Clinton Set To Sign A Bill To Overhaul The IRS
President Clinton Signs U.S. Holocaust Assets Commission Act
Justice Department Probes Second China Satellite Incident
House Primaries In Utah, Mississippi And South Carolina
Republican Wins In Key House Race In New Mexico
House Votes To Ban New Internet Taxes
Clinton Vetoes Iran Sanctions Bill


Archives   |   CQ News   |   TIME On Politics   |   Feedback   |   Help

Copyright © 1998 AllPolitics All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this information is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.
Who we are.