ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 SPACE
* HEALTH
 AIDS
 Aging
 Alternative
 Cancer
 Children
 Diet & Fitness
 Men
 Women
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 ARTS & STYLE
 NATURE
 IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS
 myCNN

 Headline News brief
 news quiz
 daily almanac

  MULTIMEDIA:
 video
 video archive
 audio
 multimedia showcase
 more services

  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:

  health > women > story page AIDSAlternative MedicineCancerDiet & FitnessHeartMenSeniorsWomen

C-sections: Then and now

May 19, 1999
Web posted at: 5:01 PM EDT (2101 GMT)


In this story:

Early history

Huge increase until the 1990s

Hope for fewer C-sections

Initiative for vaginal birth

Making birth easier

RELATEDSicon



By Stephanie Slon

(WebMD) -- There's nothing new about cesarean sections. Surgical birth is mentioned in the ancient folklore of both Eastern and Western cultures. However, the reasons for the operation as well as its techniques and success rates have evolved dramatically over the centuries.

Early history

The earliest use of cesarean-section surgery was extracting a fetus from a dead or dying mother. This was done primarily to fulfill religious doctrines requiring that the child, who was unlikely to survive, be buried separately. In the 1500s a Swiss farmer -- whose only surgical experience was neutering pigs -- carried out the first recorded cesarean section in which both the mother and baby survived. C-sections continued to be performed over the next few centuries but with almost universally grim outcomes; one estimate calculates that between 1787 and 1876 not a single Parisian woman survived the surgery.

Huge increase until the 1990s

By the middle of this century innovations in anesthesia, antiseptic practices, and antibiotics -- coupled with the rise of hospital-based deliveries -- established cesarean birth as a safe procedure. However, the C-section continued to be uncommon until the 1980s, when it grew to represent nearly a quarter of all deliveries. This high water mark was a fivefold increase from only the previous decade. Interestingly, the rise in the C-section rate itself was a major element in pushing the numbers up: Until the 1990s doctors lived by the dictum "Once a C-section, always a C-section."

The C-section rate in this country has come under intense scrutiny since it reached its peak in 1988. Critics have expressed alarm at the frequency of the procedure. Although it can save lives, a cesarian is major abdominal surgery that opens the mother to the risks of infection, blood loss, and even death. For the baby, premature birth, low birth weight, and breathing problems are all possible risks. Moreover, the cost of the operation is nearly double that of a vaginal birth.

Hope for fewer C-sections

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has targeted a 15 percent cesarean delivery rate by the end of this century. This is also the number the World Health Organization finds acceptable; most other industrialized nations are well within this limit. In the United States, cesarean sections reached a low of 20.8 percent in 1995 but climbed again to 21.5 percent the following year, making the 15 percent goal unlikely by 2000.

Initiative for vaginal birth

Since about a third of C-sections are repeat operations, there is a major initiative under way encouraging women to attempt a vaginal birth (VBAC) if they've had a cesarean. This is possible because the low, horizontal incision currently used in C-sections doesn't carry the danger of rupturing the uterus with subsequent labors, as did the older surgical technique. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists endorses VBAC as the preferred birth method after one and possibly even two or more C-sections.

The efforts to popularize VBAC are beginning to pay off. In 1995, 35.5 percent of women with previous cesareans gave birth vaginally -- more than five times the number of VBACs in 1985. There is still room for improvement, however. Some estimates say as many as 80 percent of women who have had cesareans are capable of having a safe VBAC.

Making birth easier

The real challenge, of course, lies in limiting the number of first-time C-sections. In a certain percentage of cases a cesarean is unavoidable -- for example, when labor is halted, the baby is in breech position, or there are signs of serious fetal distress. There is also new evidence that a cesarean delivery prevents the transmission of HIV infection from mother to child.

Under normal circumstances, however, a woman improves her chances of an uncomplicated birth by educating herself about the birth process and being up-front with her providers about how much medical intervention she finds acceptable. Studies have also demonstrated that enlisting the aid of a nonmedical labor support person, called a doula, can significantly reduce the likelihood of a C-section.

Copyright 1999 by WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved.



RELATEDS AT WebMD:
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Labor and Delivery

RELATED SITES:
See related sites about Health

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

LATEST HEALTH STORIES:
China SARS numbers pass 5,000
Report: Form of HIV in humans by 1940
Fewer infections for back-sleeping babies
Pneumonia vaccine may help heart, too
 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.