What's in a name?
Labels are weapons in abortion debate
From Correspondent Bruce Morton
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Over the years, the abortion debate has
become increasingly vocal and confrontational. It wasn't
always that way. In the early days of film, use of the word
"abortion" was taboo.
In the 1916 silent movie "Where Are My Children?" a young
woman dies after a botched abortion. At the same time, the
district attorney, who loves children, learns that his wife,
who loves her social life, has had an abortion.
The word abortion is never used.
In the 1972 movie "A Place in the Sun," a year before Roe vs.
Wade, Shelley Winters wants to have an abortion because her
boyfriend won't marry her.
The doctor's advice: "Go home to your mother." He refuses to
provide an abortion.
The word abortion is never spoken.
That same year, the television character Maude, pregnant and
approaching 50, decides, along with her husband, to have an
abortion.
The word is spoken once in the 30-minute episode -- and not
when they make their decision.
Norman Lear, who produced the series "Maude," said there
wasn't much public furor over the show. But he doesn't think
today's reaction would be as docile.
"I have to believe, from everything I see, everything I know
about television today, absolutely not," Lear said. "And
everything I know about what is happening out there on the
right and the religious right, and with that subject in the
Congress, I would say, no."
Tagging the enemy
After the Supreme Court's Roe vs. Wade decision in 1973, the
abortion debate became more focused and public. Labels
mattered -- a lot.
Anti-abortion groups refer to babies, not fetuses.
"I think one thing that has been continuous is our use of the
term 'right to life,'" explained Darla St. Martin, associate
director of the national anti-abortion group Right to Life.
"It is the name of our organization, Right To Life, and we
have emphasized that aspect of it in the beginning and to
continue to, because for us, that's the central question."
And St. Martin's label for the other side?
"Generally I say pro-abortion, because they are for legal
abortion," she said.
But abortion-rights supporters want a different label:
pro-choice.
Ad companies take sides
Herbert Gunther of Public Media Center has created
advertisements for Planned Parenthood.
"The other side, the religious extremists that would ban
abortion under all circumstances, had rather successfully
framed the issue in terms of pictures of healthy babies,
smiling babies, and created this image that abortion was
equal to killing babies, which is an extremely cynical and
misleading image, as a lot of commercial advertising often
is," Gunther said.
"Our purpose was to counter what was a very powerful agenda
set by them. Who could be in support of baby-killers, who
actually stand up and justify killing babies? No one.
Certainly not the people who fought and defended a woman's
right to choose."
Choice was an effective label. But the private Arthur DeMoss
Foundation countered with ads that used choice in a different
context.
The ads compared ultrasound pictures of a fetus with pictures
of a child. Both can turn, jump and kick, the ad says,
climaxing with the phrase: "Life: What a beautiful choice."
So the labels clang back and forth: coat-hanger abortions,
baby-killers. Labels matter, as any pollster will tell you.
The most recent example was the debate over a bill in
Congress that attempted to ban and criminalize a type of
late-term abortion that anti-abortion activists labeled
"partial-birth abortion."
"This atrocity permits jamming scissors into the back of the
neck, opening the hole and suctioning the brain out," said
Rep. Henry Hyde, a conservative Republican from Illinois.
"It's the entire fight -- to set the agenda," Gunther says.
That fight, that debate, is 25 years old now, and shows no
signs of stopping.