ad info

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
Tech

From...

Magaziner and Dyson tell government "hands off the Net"

Magaziner   

June 12, 1998
Web posted at: 5:00 p.m. EDT

by Tom Watson

(IDG) -- What role, if any, should the government play in regulating the Internet? On a stage where Abraham Lincoln once spoke in support of the Union, Clinton administration Net czar Ira Magaziner and technocapitalist Esther Dyson answered swiftly: precious little.

In a panel discussion at New York's Cooper Union sponsored by the New York New Media Association last night, Dyson and Magaziner differed only on how little the government should intervene in the fast-developing Internet economy. Magaziner argued that because development in the digital world is so swift, it's nearly impossible for the slow processes of government to keep pace. And Dyson argued strongly against regulation, at one point scoffing at the notion that the key decisions of the digital age should be left up to "a bunch of voters."

They suggested that the government's antitrust powers were sufficient - the equivalent of a constitutional check against self-regulated industry. Besides, said Magaziner, "we've tried to be as consultative as possible."

 MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
  IDG.net home page
  Industry Standard home page
  Industry Standard daily Media Grok
  Industry Standard financial news

That left the third panelist, Harvard Law School's Larry Lessig, special master in the Microsoft case, to argue that the Clinton administration's policy of industry self-regulation effectively placed cyberspace outside the Constitution - and thus beyond the purview of ordinary Americans. He said the administration's cyber policy is a product of people's "pathetic resignation" to the foibles of elected government, deflecting the slavish devotion to free markets and "economic growth" exhibited by Dyson and Magaziner. Moreover, he argued that it was too soon for the government to simply step aside in cyberspace. That kind of talk can get you lynched in Silicon Valley, but this was New York; Lessig got the night's loudest applause.

rule

Related CNN Interactive stories:
Latest Headlines

Today on CNN

Related stories at IDG.net:

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window

External sites are not
endorsed by CNN Interactive.

SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

  
 

Back to the top
© 2000 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.