Divided jury spares Nichols from death sentence
Forewoman: Not convinced he was 'greatly involved' in blast
In this story:
January 7, 1998
Web posted at: 8:03 p.m. EST (0103 GMT)
DENVER (CNN) -- Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry
Nichols escaped a death sentence Wednesday, when a badly
divided panel of jurors was unable to agree on a unanimous
decision in the penalty phase of his trial.
"The government was not able to prove to us satisfactorily
that Terry Nichols was greatly involved in this process, only
that he was somewhat involved," jury forewoman Niki Deutchman
told a news conference after jurors were dismissed.
Deutchman, the only juror to speak immediately after the
trial ended, criticized the government's investigation into
the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Oklahoma City federal
building that killed 168 people and injured more than 500.
"There were a lot of things about the evidence that seemed to
be sloppy," she said. In particular, she questioned the FBI's
decision to take notes, rather than tape record, key
interviews in the case, including a nine-hour interview with
Nichols. Those notes were then submitted to the jury.
Forewoman: FBI 'arrogant'
"It seems arrogant to me, on the part of the FBI, to say,
'You know, we have good recall, and you can take what we have
said,'" Deutchman said, adding that the trial experience led
her to "understand how someone would be unhappy with the
government."
Family members of victims and survivors of the blast reacted
angrily to the lack of a decision on a penalty -- and
Deutchman's negative comments about the government's case.
"I think that the jury was very anti-government ... that they
were mad at the government when they went in there and didn't
go in there with an open mind and evidently didn't listen to
evidence," said Roy Sells, whose wife died in the explosion.
"The jury failed us," said Darlene Welch, whose niece died in
the attack.
The anti-government sentiments of Nichols and his
co-conspirator, Timothy McVeigh, are what prosecutors allege
motivated the attack in Oklahoma City.
While saying nothing justified the bombing and massive loss
of life, Deutchman said the "government's attitude -- and the
FBI is definitely included in that -- is part of where all of
this comes from in the first place."
"There are a fair number of people out there who are pretty
unhappy with the government and feel unsafe and very
suspicious," Deutchman said. "I think maybe it's time for the
government to be more respectful and to be more aware of each
of us as people with inalienable rights ... and not with the
attitude of 'We know, and you don't. We have the power, and
you don't.'"
Those comments drew a strong reaction from Dawn DeArmon,
whose mother died in the blast. She said that while many
people may have been unhappy with the government from time to
time, "that gives no one the right to kill or blow up a
building -- no right."
In state court, Nichols could still face execution
Instead of the death penalty, the jury also could have
recommended a sentence of life without parole. But in either
case, the decision had to be unanimous.
Because jurors were unable to agree on a sentence, the task
falls to U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch, who may not make
a decision for several months.
He could hand down a sentence of life in prison, but will not
have the option of imposing the death penalty. Under federal
law, only a jury has that power. Matsch set a February 9
deadline for attorneys to file the first motions in the
sentencing process.
Nichols could still face execution. Oklahoma City prosecutors
reiterated Wednesday that they intend to try both Nichols and
McVeigh on state murder charges, which could carry the death
penalty. McVeigh already has been convicted in federal court
for his role in the bombing, and was given a death sentence.
In their federal trials, Nichols and McVeigh only faced
charges in connection with the deaths of eight law
enforcement officers. State prosecutors can charge them with
murder for the deaths of the other 160 victims without
violating constitutional prohibitions on trying people twice
for the same crime, so-called "double jeopardy."
"I just want to be a safety net to make sure this thing ends
up with justice being done for everyone," said Oklahoma
County District Attorney Bob Macy.
"In this case, there is a feeling of emptiness and
inadequacy," Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating said. "This process
is not over, so we are all going to have to steel ourselves
for more months to come of court proceedings. Only then can
we sleep soundly."
Deutchman: Some not convinced Nichols built bomb
During the first phase of Nichols' trial, the jury found him
guilty of being part of the conspiracy with McVeigh to build
the bomb that blew up the Alfred P. Murrah federal building.
Jurors also convicted Nichols on December 23 of eight counts
of involuntary manslaughter. He was acquitted of first-degree
murder and use of a truck bomb in the deadliest terrorist act
ever on U.S. soil.
Explaining the verdict, Deutchman said that while jurors
thought there was enough evidence to prove that Nichols
participated in the conspiracy, some of them were not
convinced he actually helped build the bomb or knew when
McVeigh intended to use it.
She said some jurors -- "not many" -- also thought McVeigh
had coerced Nichols into participating in the plot. She
indicated that some jurors felt the government didn't do
enough to pursue other possible suspects in the trial.
"If there were people who were actively involved in this
horrible crime, then it's an obligation to find them and to
bring them into the justice system," she said. "I doubt that
two people -- even if Terry Nichols was deeply involved --
would be enough to carry it off."
Deutchman also said that after their initial verdict, many
jurors were surprised that there was even a penalty phase to
consider a death sentence.
She described the atmosphere during the 13 hours of
deliberations over two days as "tense" and indicated there
may be some residual hard feelings among jurors.
"I think there were a lot of very strong feelings, and a
feeling of frustration that we weren't at a place where we
were unanimous," she said.
"The differences of opinion were very strong," Deutchman said. "The sentencing phase obviously was excruciating. It was agonizing."
No reaction from Nichols
|
|
Matsch
| |
One of the jurors wept in court as Matsch discharged them.
Nichols, 42, showed no emotion. Some members of his family
smiled, and his sister, Suzanne McDonnell, said she was
greatly relieved.
"The judge has given everyone a valuable object lesson on how
the system works," said lead defense attorney Michael Tigar.
"On behalf of the Nichols family, we thank everybody."
Prosecutor Larry Mackey predicted that the survivors of the
bombing and the families of victims would be "disappointed"
by Wednesday's developments.
"We, of course, regret that the jury was unable to reach an
unanimous decision. But we understand how difficult those
deliberations must have been, and we are grateful [for] their
service," Mackey said. "It falls to us now to proceed forward
to press with [Matsch] for the most appropriate sentence."
Correspondents Tony Clark and Susan Candiotti and Reuters contributed to this report.