ad info

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
US

Court: Disability law covers HIV

graphic

Another ruling: Suspected Nazi must testify

June 25, 1998
Web posted at: 2:42 p.m. EDT (1842 GMT)

In this story:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Having HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, is a disability covered by federal anti-discrimination protection, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.

In a separate ruling the court said witnesses cannot use their legal right against self-incrimination solely because they fear being prosecuted in another country.

HIV ruling

The Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling in the HIV case set aside a lower court decision that said Randon Bragdon, a Maine dentist, violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) when he refused in 1994 to fill an HIV-infected woman's tooth in his office.

Bragdon said he would treat Sidney Abbott's tooth only at a hospital and she would have to pay the additional cost. Abbott sued under ADA, a federal civil rights law which bars disability discrimination.

Public health authorities say there is no documented case of a dentist contracting the AIDS virus from a patient. But Bragdon contended he should be allowed to use his own judgment on how to safely treat such patients.

HIV is 'physical impairment'

In Thursday's decision, the lower court was ordered to reconsider whether Bragdon violated the disabilities law. "We do not foreclose the possibility that the Court of Appeals may reach the same conclusion it did earlier," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority.

Kennedy said in his majority opinion that the appeals court should consider:

  • "HIV infection satisfies the statutory and regulatory definition of a physical impairment during every stage of the disease."

  • The dentist, in deciding how to treat an HIV-infected woman, "had the duty to assess the risk of infection based on the objective, scientific information available to him and others in his profession."

  • In deciding whether a health-care provider has violated the disability-protection law, "courts should assess the objective reasonableness of the views of health care professionals without deferring to their individual judgments."

Dissenting in part were Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Sandra Day O'Connor.

The ADA, signed by President Bush in 1990, protects disabled people against discrimination in jobs, housing and public accommodations such as dentists' offices. Some of the law's most visible results are aids such as wheelchair ramps at countless public places.

The law says people are disabled if they have a physical or mental impairment that "substantially limits one or more major life activities."

Defeat for suspected Nazi collaborator

Another of Thursday's Supreme Court rulings was a defeat for Aloyzas Balsys, 85, a suspected Nazi collaborator who now lives in Woodhaven, New York.

The case stemmed from a 1993 subpoena issued by the Justice Department requiring Balsys, a resident alien born in Lithuania, to answer questions about his activities during World War II and his immigration to the United States.

At his deposition, Balsys refused to testify, invoking the privilege against forced self-incrimination. He said his answers could subject him to prosecution in Lithuania, Israel and Germany.

But in its 7-2 ruling the Supreme Court said Balsys had no legal right against self-incrimination based solely on his fear of "foreign prosecution."

He now faces a contempt citation if he continues to refuse providing answers.

The Justice Department had warned that extending the constitutional protection would hurt U.S. law enforcement efforts in deportation cases and against terrorists and drug smugglers.

It said witnesses in a growing number of cases involving criminals who operate internationally may refuse to testify, claiming they face prosecution in another country.

Correspondent Charles Bierbauer, The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.



 
Supreme Court half banner

Supreme Court:
1997-1998 Session



Related stories:
Latest Headlines

Today on CNN

Related sites:

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window

External sites are not
endorsed by CNN Interactive.


Barnes and Noble
  related readingbook search
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

  
 

Back to the top
© 2000 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.