October 3, 1995
The O.J. Simpson trial was an unprecedented media sensation in the
United States. It was also big news in many other parts of the world. Here is a
sampling of international reaction to the verdict.
October 3, 1995
Few public officials missed an opportunity to comment Tuesday on the Simpson
verdict. Most expressed sympathy for the families of the victims and trust in the
jury.
October 3, 1995
In the seeming eternity before the
"not guilty" verdict was uttered, O.J. Simpson's face assumed
emotions at both ends of the spectrum. First he furrowed his
brow in seeming concern. Then he stiffened his jaw. Then he
smiled slightly. Then he looked more concerned. Moments
later, he was wearing a smile. And reactions from both
players and observers in this "verdict of the century"
revealed a similar array of responses.
October 3, 1995
Orenthal James Simpson is a free man (2M QT movie).
He was acquitted Tuesday in the brutal stabbing murders of
his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald
Goldman, outside her luxury townhouse on the night of June
12, 1994 (512K AIFF sound or 512K WAV sound).
October 3, 1995
It is a startling cliffhanger, as
gripping a courtroom drama as ever graced a television screen
-- the O.J. Simpson jury, after deliberating less than a day,
told Judge Lance Ito Monday afternoon that they had reached a
verdict. And Ito immediately sealed the verdict, turned it
over to the court's bailiff and sent everyone home for the
night.
September 24, 1995
They've been sitting silent for eight months.
Now it will be the jury's turn to speak and to
decide the fate of O. J. Simpson. Here's how
it all began.
September 25, 1995
Before the murders of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman,
O. J. Simpson was a superstar celebrity who seemed to have
it all - a beautiful family and home, football fame,
commercial endorsements, movie roles - a public image
prosecutors needed to dismantle in court. Art Harris looks
at how the prosecution has tried to make this case stick and
how the defense has done its best to make it come unglued.
September 25, 1995
The Simpson trial was billed as High Noon for DNA. Faced
with two murders, no witnesses, and no weapons, prosecutor
were banking on blood to tell the story - DNA tests pointing
to one man, damning O.J. Simpson with his genetic fingerprints.
But Simpson's lawyers had other suspects in mind. And as Art
Harris reports, they may have found a powerful way to fight DNA.
September 25, 1995
Some lawyers say juries are like snowflakes - no two are
the same. No one knows how the Simpson jury will vote. This
is a city where juries in high-profile cases, as in the first
Rodney King trial, deliver verdicts that shock a nation. And
no jury has ever had so many problems aired so publicly. Here's
a look at how the trials of the men and women of this jury may
help us understand their verdict.
September 24, 1995
To reach a verdict, the jury must consider only the
evidence submitted in court. But we don't know what
those jurors may have heard from the court of public
opinion - the mainstream press, the tabloids, gossip,
rumor, fact and fiction. What have visitors told them?
Has anything been whispered in pillow talk? Art Harris
explores some of the things that the sequestered jury
never saw, and how they might have made a difference in the verdict.
September 24, 1995
A lot more than the fate of O.J. Simpson is riding on
how the jury votes. However it ends, the case has forced
us to ask - is our criminal justice system fair? And will
the verdict deepen America's racial divide. Art Harris
reports how the trial has opened old wounds that lead
far beyond Los Angeles.